The Art of Playing Devil's Advocate in Security Work

security guard devil's advocate
Security guards are often seen as enforcers of rules, the people who say "no" and point to the policy manual. But some of the most effective security professionals have mastered a less obvious skill: playing devil's advocate with their own assumptions.

Thinking Like the Threat

A security guard who only thinks about following procedures is missing half the picture. The real value comes from asking: "If I wanted to get past this checkpoint, how would I do it?" This mindset shift transforms routine patrol work into active threat assessment.

Consider the loading dock that's checked every hour. A guard simply following protocol walks the perimeter and moves on. A guard playing devil's advocate asks: "What happens in the 59 minutes between checks? Could someone time their entry? Is there a blind spot in my route?" This internal challenge leads to better coverage and catches vulnerabilities before they're exploited.

Questioning the System

Playing devil's advocate also means respectfully challenging security protocols themselves. When management implements a new badge system, it's worth asking: "What if someone tailgates through the door? What if a badge is stolen?" These questions aren't insubordination, they're risk analysis.

The best security improvements often come from guards who questioned why things were done a certain way. Maybe the emergency exit that's supposed to stay locked actually needs to be accessible for safety. Maybe the visitor sign-in process creates a bottleneck that encourages people to slip past reception. Asking "what could go wrong?" strengthens the entire operation.

The Balance

Of course, there's a balance. Security work still requires following established procedures and respecting the chain of command. The goal isn't to be contrarian for its own sake, but to approach each shift with fresh eyes and a questioning mind.

The security guard who thinks like both protector and potential intruder, who respects the rules while questioning their weaknesses, becomes invaluable. They don't just respond to security breaches—they prevent them.